Monday, 26 March 2012
Energy-materials linkage
| Reactions: |
Wednesday, 21 March 2012
London’s Energy Future
· Current policy challenges including the price of energy (i.e. low-carbon energy is currently more expensive than high-carbon energy); energy efficiency in buildings (measuring building performance, building industry skills, building valuation and motivating/ regulating
household reduction/ consumption); and incentivising investment (via the electricity market reform, Green Deal loans and Green Investment Bank).
· GLA’s policy is that London is moving towards district heating! GLA has already produced a series of ‘heat maps (see http://www.londonheatmap.co.uk/) and is drawing up at the moment an ‘Energy Master Plan’.
· ‘Lessons’ from other countries show us that the UK needs to move towards more ‘collective thinking’ which is, however, deeply counter cultural in this country; and de-risking legislation for the energy market
· Who should design energy systems and energy policy? Economists and engineers, alongside policy makers, not only policy makers as done over the last 10 years!
· For the scale of envisaged change to happen we need to built a ‘community of practice’, continuous and coherent policy support, and include economics and engineer ‘literates’ in policy processes.
This was an interesting discussion, loaded with economic and technical stuff! However, the role that institutions and people might play in this transition has been little touched upon!
Catalina Turcu, UCL
21 March 2012
A golden age for gas - but not in Europe!

Friday, 16 March 2012
CLUES project presented in Sweden
| Reactions: |
Friday, 9 March 2012
Community Energy event
- the importance of a sound business case for community energy
- the need to invest in skills and capacity building as well as technology
- the potential dangers in the grant system of a) over-reliance on subsidies and b) inherent bias as past winners of grants succeed time and again, and
- the need to recognise equity issues in making any grants.
The aim has to be to create a self-sustaining community energy sector, which is currently proving difficult. The complexity of the policy landscape does not help and some suggested that the community sector was treated rather patronisingly, rather than recognising the way that - collectively - it is a major player in the energy field. In the managed market for energy, a separate Community Feed in Tariff would be a good way forward, establishing the basis for community enterprises to scale up and function as businesses. Normalisation of community energy should be the ambition which many argued was within reach.
Wednesday, 1 February 2012
MINDSPACE: A challenging proposal to influence (low carbon) behaviour through policy?

sciences can be used to understand and change individual behaviour, which in turn can help meet current policy challenges, such as how to reduce crime, tackle obesity and ensure environmental sustainability. With that in mind, he sets out nine of the most robust (non-coercive) influences on human behaviour, captured in a simple mnemonic – MINDSPACE – which can be used as a quick checklist when making policy. These are:
- Messenger - we are heavily influenced by who communicates information
- Incentives - our responses to incentives are shaped by predictable mental shortcuts such as strongly avoiding losses
- Norms - we are strongly influenced by what others do
- Defaults - we „go with the flow‟ of pre-set options
- Salience - our attention is drawn to what is novel and seems relevant to us
- Priming - our acts are often influenced by sub-conscious cues
- Affect - our emotional associations can powerfully shape our actions
- Commitments - we seek to be consistent with our public promises, and reciprocate acts
- Ego - we act in ways that make us feel better about ourselves
He is working at the moment on one energy related project: “The use of online social norms in
influencing energy consumption: testing whether online information can change behaviour”. The project is an experiment on social tenants in Camden which sends out individual letters that ‘expose’ where the household’s energy consumption lies in comparison to its neighbours. The research found that the households receiving personalised letters have significantly reduced their
energy consumption (by 2%) when compared to the control group (exposed to traditional
campaigning for energy consumption reduction).
However, the research also finds that the ‘letter effect’ seems to wear off in time. Thus, one-off or
short-term changes in behaviour do not seem to trigger longer term changes in lifestyles. …and this is certainly supported by some of the evidence emerging from the CLUES case studies.
Monday, 23 January 2012
Call for Papers
CLUES Conference: Energy in the Locality.
8th May 2012, University College London, London
Wednesday, 11 January 2012
Friday, 16 December 2011
Warm Swedish buildings
The Kungbronhusen Office Building is a 13-storey property in the centre of Stockholm, near the Stockholm Central Station.
Both the Central Station and the Office Building are owned by Jernhusen company.
Jerhunsen wanted to prove that it is possible to built a sustainable office building using available of the market materials and mature technologies rather than fancy but risky innovations.
The objective of the project is to create a development where the environment and energy-efficiency are central considerations.
Building’s branding is about being ‘green’: the office space is let to the companies that want to boost their image as environmentally-friendly. All the tenants in the building are supported the expert who helps to adapt the organizations and minimize their impact on the environment. The building is advertised as being ‘eco-smart’, which includes three characteristics:
- Eco-smart building: The building with energy efficient façade and environmentally adapted materials, combined with other innovative solutions that lead to three environmental certifications.
- Eco-everyday: Services and technical solutions that enable users to operate in an eco-friendly way.
- Eco-location; The building’s proximity to public transport makes travelling and transports easier and contributes to lower CO2 emissions.
The users of the building are encouraged to minimize the environmental impact of their daily activities. Building users are offered coordinated framework agreements for cleaning services, servicing of office machinery and waste management. The building is also provided with secure bicycle storage area with a compressor pump and tools available for bicycle repairs, as well as dressing rooms and showers.
Another intersting part of the building is a ‘green button’: This button is pressed at the end of the working day to ensure that all standby functions such as computers, screens and other lighting are switched off.
An important part of the project is the building’s energy-efficient frontage, which controls the amount of sunlight allowed into the internal space and creates a balance so that the interior is neither too hot nor too cold.
One of the interesting features of the building is that every hour the Swedish meteorological centre automatically sends a detailed weather forecast direct to Kungsbrohuset via the GSM network. This means that the heat supply to Kungsbrohuset will be increased several hours before a drop in temperature occurs. By doing this, building’s heat regulating system is put to optimal use.
The largest part of the heating is provided by GSHP, with some part of the heating provided by body heat! Approximately 200,000 people pass through nearby Stockholm Central Station every day. These people, along with the various restaurants and cafés in the station, produce a large amount of excess heat. Instead of letting this heat goes to waste, it now being used for heating. Kungsbrohuset building. The technology is not new and is similar to the principles of Canadian wells. The heat generated by human activity is recovered by the ventilation system and then sent away from the station in its water tanks. Heated by this hot air, the water is sent to the second building through a heat exchanger, which allows the building to save up to 20% of its energy consumption. To complete the loop, the cooled water is returned to the station to optimize its temperature control.
Jerhusen is planning to build some more office buldings around the train station in the nearset future and they also have similar projects in other cities in Sweden.
Does this mean that this kind of projects are easy to replicate and can be widely used in the UK? We will talk about it in our workshop in early February – and if you are intersted, contac tme on k.chmutina@lboro.ac.uk .
